Good news is between a doctor-recommended mix of Unisom and B6 that caused me to stop vomiting and start eating again and lots of stretching, I'm back to my usual sardonic self.
Added bonus: when I restarted my grad school program, I found a free voice-based transcription software package online to help me transcribe the interviews I am collecting for my thesis. This package lets me prepare selected quotes from the Botkin Sisters book in a quarter of the time it took me to type myself from the book. Plus, reading this book aloud is a simple pleasure. It reads a bit like a 1950's etiquette manual written by a grandmother rather than a 21st century book written by two women in their early twenties.
Let's dive back in:
Overarching Theme: Being involved in starting a romance is horrifyingly wrong!
Trying to start things
Not that it's wrong to introduce people or say nice things about person A to person B and if one's interests are known to be bigger than love and marriage- if one of the general relationship broker and not just a romance broker - people will likely take such things in the healthy spirit in which it was meant. But then there's a kind of matchmaker that a friend of ours described as "much to be feared". Like the kind that sets up introductions and tete-a-tetes as though they were directing their own personal soap opera, and stand off to the side to watch and giggle. Or like the man who once called out loudly during a large dinner, "so X wants to marry one of the Y girls, and can't decide which one!" leaving X sitting at that very moment across from the Y girls to choke on his soup and turn purple. Not only did no marriage is come of it but the friendship possibilities were largely spoiled as well (not to mention the appetites). Or like the matchmaker that has a dreadful taste and keeps trying to set us up with her the lonely, strange friends. (pg. 181-182)
Not that it's wrong to introduce people or say nice things about person A to person B and if one's interests are known to be bigger than love and marriage- if one of the general relationship broker and not just a romance broker - people will likely take such things in the healthy spirit in which it was meant. But then there's a kind of matchmaker that a friend of ours described as "much to be feared". Like the kind that sets up introductions and tete-a-tetes as though they were directing their own personal soap opera, and stand off to the side to watch and giggle. Or like the man who once called out loudly during a large dinner, "so X wants to marry one of the Y girls, and can't decide which one!" leaving X sitting at that very moment across from the Y girls to choke on his soup and turn purple. Not only did no marriage is come of it but the friendship possibilities were largely spoiled as well (not to mention the appetites). Or like the matchmaker that has a dreadful taste and keeps trying to set us up with her the lonely, strange friends. (pg. 181-182)
Yes, standing off to the side and
watching two people you've introduced meet each other and giggling
is immature. Like Junior High-level of immaturity . That's why we
don't let junior high students be matchmakers. However, real adults
generally do not behave like this. if you are a real adult and your
friends behave like this, you need to find new friends.
Be honest now. How many married
couples do you know that never had an awkward moment while
dating due to an odd family member making an offhand reference? X
may marry one of the Y girls someday and this would be a hilarious
story to pass on in the family.
Trying to stop things
Often this is because the meddler actually wants to start something else. We've seen good conversations hijacked by jealous third parties. We've seen people try to sabotage other people's relationships (sometimes throwing themselves in the way or interposing other people). We've seen girls complain about guys talking to and befriending other girls which would normally be the kind of thing that they would promote, were not their own interests in the way) and raising motions to get these things stopped. (pg. 182)
Often this is because the meddler actually wants to start something else. We've seen good conversations hijacked by jealous third parties. We've seen people try to sabotage other people's relationships (sometimes throwing themselves in the way or interposing other people). We've seen girls complain about guys talking to and befriending other girls which would normally be the kind of thing that they would promote, were not their own interests in the way) and raising motions to get these things stopped. (pg. 182)
- I really think the Botkin Sisters need new friends. This
behavior is age appropriate between 12 and 14 years of age and
should be completely gone by age 20.
- When they use the word "interposing" this is
actually a long set up for a footnote that invokes the
Doctrine of Interposition as a joke. Look, I love academic jokes as
much as the next person but your audience has to know the doctrine
for the joke to make any sense. Based on my Google search, very few
people study or use the Doctrine of Interposition on a regular
basis.
- Man, talk about cutting off your own nose to spite your face.
Trying to get boy-girl talk banned will come back to bite you when
you meet the next cute guy. Of course, most of us learn that lesson
in - surprise, surprise! - Junior High.
Looking out for number one
Rather than looking out for everyone else is good, sometimes we're actually just looking out for our own good. Maybe we're not trying to set and match someone else's game. Maybe our own love life is the soap opera that we're trying to write and direct. Maybe we're manipulating circumstances and engineering stale mates among our friends because we want something or someone for ourselves. We interpose, hijack, flatter, slander, stalk and show two faces so that we can win this game. (pg. 185)
Rather than looking out for everyone else is good, sometimes we're actually just looking out for our own good. Maybe we're not trying to set and match someone else's game. Maybe our own love life is the soap opera that we're trying to write and direct. Maybe we're manipulating circumstances and engineering stale mates among our friends because we want something or someone for ourselves. We interpose, hijack, flatter, slander, stalk and show two faces so that we can win this game. (pg. 185)
- Welcome to reality. Most adults are in control of their own love life. They choose to take an active role in it. This is not new nor should it be condemned.
- Ahh. Another example of "one
thing is not like the other" from the Botkin Sisters. Flattery
can be a part of romantic relationship. Hijacking, slandering,
stalking and being two-faced is likely to end badly in the long run
– and stalking is illegal. (Well, so is hijacking, but they are
using a different use of the word....)
- Looking back over various
relationships and people who try to sabotage other people's
relationships, I can't think of many examples where the relationship
actually ended because of the sabotuer's actions. I mean, the couple
isn't stupid; you can tell when someone is messing with you. Plus,
I can't think of any time that the sabotuer ended up in a long-term
relationship with the person whose relationship they ended.
You're back! I love this blog, and I was so sad when I thought you'd disappeared. Congratulations on your pregnancy and grad program, that's wonderful!
ReplyDeleteThank you! Yeah, I really did drop off for a while, but I hope to be back at least until the kid comes!
Delete