Monday, May 14, 2018

Dominion Orientated Femininity: Part Five

I apologize for the late post. My husband was injured in a workplace accident and burned his arm. He's doing fine, but the burn got infected so he's had a lot more doctor's appointments than usual so I've had much less free time than usual. Thank God for antibiotics!

This post covers the seventh and eighth points on the topic of dominion-orientated women.  When I was in junior high, I was really into Star Trek: Deep Space Nine.  In DS9, a massive interstellar federation that could be contacted by traveling through the wormhole was called the Dominion.  Bluntly, I'd prefer to listen to a podcast of fanfic surrounding women from the Dominion than having to listen to the Botkin Sisters blather on about womanhood.


Number seven is a dominion woman thinks like a shepherd. Jesus said, "Do you love me? Feed my sheep." And this is a basic Christian duty that we have to make disciples of all the nations. And this for many of us young homeschooled girls this is going to involve overcoming obstacles like shyness and timidity. This can be very hard for us. I used to be extremely shy. I used to be so shy I had a hard time talking to a person one-on-one let alone even thinking about standing up on stage and speaking to over 500 people like I'm doing right now.


I have a mental block when thinking about how CP/QF adherents are going to make disciples of all the nations.  So many of their beliefs are interwoven with white middle-class values from the 1950's US that they struggle to convert new members and lose a good number of children born into CP/QF homes to other belief systems.   When they struggle this badly in their homeland, I can't imagine how this could spread to other nations.   Derick and Jill Dillard's abortive attempts at missionary work in El Salvador demonstrates many of the issues.  The Dillards had energy, youth and enthusiasm on their side.  Unfortunately, their lack of fluency in Spanish, minimal cultural appreciation, and absence of previous training or experience in launching a mission doomed their venture. 

The Gothardite/Vision Forum/ IBLP/IFB belief system has two separate issues that doom missionary work.  First, cults work best when members are highly indoctrinated in cult materials and marginally educated in other ideas.  The Wisdom Booklets are constructed to indoctrinate by exposing adherents to the same ideas repeatedly while selectively demonstrating outside facts that "support" the cult ideas.   The problem is that these ideas won't hold up well when adherents are exposed to a wider education which happens when people are immersed in a foreign language and culture.

The second issue is the idolization of large families of closely spaced children.  In my church, missionaries are primarily single adult men and women - generally priests or sisters.  Simply, single adults are easiest to embed in a new culture.  They are able and willing to focus intensely on determining the needs of the community, searching out culturally and economically sustainable solutions, and are able to bring specialized skills in medicine, education, engineering or agriculture.  They strive to be a benefit to their new home.  The issue with missionaries who have huge families is that supporting that many kids is a drain on the new church mission.  Additionally, the medical needs of actively reproducing women and young children are much different than a celibate men and women.   Jill Dillard faced an unenviable choice of traveling repeatedly between the US and El Salvador for prenatal care and delivery or utilizing a scarce resource in a developing country that was facing difficult times.  As her sons grew and became more mobile, they would need a series of expensive vaccines for typhoid and rabies.

Changing subjects abruptly, a lot of kids are shy especially around new adults in groups.  Being so shy that you remember struggling to talk one-on-one to other person sounds agonizing.  I can't help but wonder how much kept away from other people through homeschooling along with exclusion from community activities worsened the issue.  Thinking back over my campers when I was a counselor, I always had a few shy or introverted campers who needed a bit of help breaking the ice with the other girls - but that wore off pretty quickly both in the cabin and in workshop groups.

And I realized after a while that my shyness was a result of two things: excessive focus on self and fear of man. That's what shyness always is. And my father helped me understand that this was something that I needed to get over. And so he told me, "You need to focus on other people and when you do that, your shyness will go away. And he was right. It did. But if we're going to be shepherds, we have to learn to stop thinking about ourselves and we have to learn to love the other people we are supposed to be ministering to. We can't retreat into ourselves. We have to ignore our comfort zone and reach out to others.

My method for helping shy teenagers is to pair them up with friendly teenagers.  I'm going to stick with that method over telling the teenagers that they are being self-centered and need to get over themselves.   The Botkin girl who is speaking in this section clearly believes her father's method is great - but the story is creepy as hell to me.

The exhortation to reach out to others and avoid retreating into a personal comfort zone is surreal coming from a pair of sisters who have disappeared for months, if not years, from their website and social media.  They've withdrawn from all sorts of potentially discomforting arenas like advanced education, starting a career or forming their own family.  If they cannot branch out in the first steps to becoming independent adults when they are in their early 30's, how do they hope to convert everyone on the planet?

And the good thing is when we're thinking like that it gives us boldness in how we interact with people. Some girls have told us that they panic or they break out in a cold sweat when someone asks them, "So what do you do?" I'm sure you've all gotten that question and I'm sure you know it's an interesting question to be asked and I'm not sure why it's frightening for some girls. I guess because they're afraid of disapproval or confrontation. But instead I think we should look at this question as an opportunity to talk to people about the beauties of God's design. Why should we be ashamed? We have nothing to be ashamed of. God's ways are wiser than the heathen's ways and we should be happy whenever someone gives us the opportunity to explain that. Here's a verse I love in Deuteronomy 4. Moses has just given the Israelites several of God's Commands and says "Keep them and do them for that is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the peoples who will hear all these statutes and say, 'Surely, this great nation is a wise and understanding people.' For what nation is there that has a God so near to it as the Lord Our God whenever we call on him? Or what nation is there that has statutes and judgements as righteous as this whole law which I am setting before you today?" Honestly, what nation is there that has statues and judgement as righteous as the law which we have?

 *waves*

Hi!  I'm one of those people who cannot entirely hide my disapproval of young women who leave education and career in order to "train" to be a wife and mother before they are married or pregnant.

I understand that sometimes people need to take time off for health or family reasons; that's part of life and NOT what I'm talking about here.  After all, I took time off from college to receive treatment for depression and anxiety and suspended my graduate school program to care for my premature son.  Sometimes life throws a curve ball and we just have to do the best we can to get through the tough times.

No, I'm thinking of the 17-year old woman who I met at a young adult Catholic event when I was 19 or so.  She had just graduated high school after being homeschooled and we were excited to hear about what she was planning to do next.  She replied that she was going to live at home until she got married and started a family.  Someone asked when she was getting married because we assumed that she was engaged.  She was not engaged.  In fact, she wasn't dating anyone.

The response of the rest of us was that being a wife and a mother was a great life goal - and one that she was very likely to achieve.  In the meantime, though, she should probably do something or learn something.  Most of us were concerned that a very young woman who was on the sheltered side who was focused entirely on marriage and motherhood would be far too likely to marry the first man who displayed any interest in her - regardless of if he was a good match.  We also worried about how boring living at home without any stimulation from a job or education might be for a young woman.


And we need to not assume that the other nations are going to be hostile or look down on us. Because they don't sometimes. A lot of people have responded very interestingly when Anna and I tell them what we're doing and why. A lot of girls actually.have responded very wistfully and said, "You know what? I wish I could do that. I would love nothing more than to be able to do that." A lot of people can see the wisdom in what we're doing but we have to be bold in our witness.

Let's discuss for a few minutes why those wistful girls can't stay home.

 If I had bounced that idea off my parents, they would have rejected it immediately.   There was no one in my home who needed me to give in-home care to and I was healthy enough to restart college within a few months after I was diagnosed with depression.  All of us kids had the option of working after high school or receiving advanced training.  Sitting at home for years while waiting for someone to marry sounds irresponsible from a parenting point of view.

The other issue I see is that the stay-at-home daughter movement expects parents to financially support unmarried daughters forever.  Most of the CP/QF families in my area are working-class families that won't be able to provide much more than room and possibly board for their adult daughters.  Paying for clothing, computers, travel, and all of the incidentals for a middle-class lifestyle is beyond these families unless the daughters are working.   I've never heard a coherent plan for how a stay-at-home daughter will be supported once their father has died.  Sarah Mally and Sarah Maxwell are in their mid-to late 30's.  Both women have income streams from self-published books and Sarah Maxwell does some work for her brothers' businesses - but I doubt the income for either woman is enough to support themselves independently let alone at the socioeconomic standard that they are used to.  Steven Maxwell seems to be withdrawing from at least one of the Maxwell Family businesses as he approaches retirement age while Anna is now prominently displayed as a call-service representative for Nathan's business.  The darkest outcome I can imagine for the Maxwell family is that Sarah, Anna and Mary's incomes are used to support the Maxwell parents during their retirement - and then the women are left without career skills or a nest egg when they are suddenly without a male income source when they are in their 40's, 50's or 60's.

Moving on to number eight. A dominion woman strengthens her arms and trains her mind. Now, one of the things that our family has been accused of is that we don't believe that women should be educated. I don't know how many times we can say this but we said it as many times as we possibly can. We believe that Christian women... Christian young women need to be the best educated women in the world in the right ways and for the right reasons. And a useful woman a dominion woman the kind we've been describing here today is one who has been equipped for the battle is ready for all the duties of life is ready for anything that life might bring her. She's ready to live in a 400 sq ft. almost finished house or she's ready to be the president's daughter or she's ready to live in a mud hut in Africa. She's ready for anything and everything.

The Botkin Sisters believe women should be highly educated - then immediately demonstrate their ignorance.   First, they highly qualify the standard of education to "the right ways" and "the right reasons".  They might as well just say, "We should be highly educated in cult materials." 

No one in their right mind should try and have two people living in one "almost finished" 400 square foot house.  That's a tiny space for two adults with all 400 feet being usable.  There's no room left for areas under construction.  Since people who are not using birth control have a 50% chance of getting pregnant within 3 months and 90% within a year, the family had better have have a plan for expanding that house rapidly.....

Let's not fall back on primitive stereotypes about Africa, ok?    Go read about 5 different African countries on Wikipedia.  Write a comparative essay on your findings. 

If the Maxwells and Mallys are looking down the barrel at future poverty, Anna Sofia and Elizabeth should be extremely worried.  Near as I can tell, the Botkin family has most of their income coming from the younger brother's T. Rex Arms.  That's not a lot of money to support six adults on let alone save up money for the Botkin parents' retirement or a nest egg for the girls.  I hope they are ready for that.

One thing that we need to be asking ourselves is "What is the goal of our education? What are we really preparing to do?" And here's a quote by William B. Sprague in a letter to his daughter that I really like and he says, "The object of education is two-fold: to develop the faculties and to direct them, to bring out the energies of the soul and to bring them to operate to the glories of the creator. In other words, it is to render yourself useful to the extent of your ability." So the purpose of our education is to equip us for the great assignment as women: to be helpers suitable to brave dominion men who have the task of discipling the nations and to be the mothers and teachers of the future generations of Christian warriors. And if we want to raise our sons to be the next presidents, preachers, filmmakers, writers, culture-changers, we're going to need to have an excellent education.

I agree with Sprague that education is about training people to be useful to society at large.  I don't think Victoria Botkin managed to do that with her daughters.    I was thinking about Anna Sofia and Elizabeth's lives while I was mowing the lawn.  They are in their thirties and have achieved none of the milestones that mark adulthood in CP/QF or wider society.  They've never held a job let alone a career.  They've never lived outside of their immediate family.  They've never had a long term romantic relationships.  They've never married.  They have no children.   I suppose they remain busy cleaning up after their two brothers who still live at home and I'm sure their sisters-in-law are grateful for the help they give in childcare - but is that really the fullest extent of their innate skills?  They update their website on a yearly basis.  They've written two books in 15-odd years.  They produced a thoroughly odd movie about stay-at-home daughters.   I'm not impressed.

Now, the question is, " Well, how do we....how do we go about that? How do we educate ourselves in these ways?" And I have another quote here that I really like by John Taylor Gatto who's a former New York Time Teacher of the Year . He says, "Close reading of tough minded writing is still the best, cheapest and quickest method known for learning to think for yourself. Reading and rigorous discussion of that reading is a way that obliges you to formulate a position and support it against objections. It is an operational definition of education in its most fundamental civilized sense." And I might say even better than reading books is writing books [laughs].

*cringes*  The self-referencial praise of people who write books grates on my nerves every time.

I find Gatto to be a bit iconoclastic - but I completely agree with his quote.  My high school English courses along with a phenomenally good Morality course my senior year were based around reading difficult material and discussing it at length with other students and the teacher.  This followed through into my (unfortunately few) college level Humanities and Arts classes.  Based on my memories of  "It's (Not) That Complicated", I doubt either of the sisters was reading at the depth or breadth expected in a college preparatory education.  I know I've forgotten a few novels we read, but I remember reading "Red Badge of Courage", "Lord of the Flies",and "The Odyssey" along with a large research project on a composer, sculptor, painter and in 9th grade.  The next year we read "The Crucible", "The Great Gatsby", "Grapes of Wrath",  "The Education of Little Tree", and "To Kill A Mockingbird" along with a research project on any topic relating to TKAM in American Literature.  Junior year we read "Beowulf", "Macbeth", and "Jane Eyre" for British Literature.  My senior year we read "Utopia", "Hamlet", "Beloved", "Jazz" before diving into cinema classics like "Citizen Kane", "Amadeus", and "Casablanca".    On top of that, we were reading scads of short stories and poems between each of the novels.   Heck, two of my friends and I made a rather horrible, but accurate film version of Poe's "The Fall of the House of Usher" for extra credit.   

I don't believe that the Botkin sisters have been exposed to close readings of works that would be critical of American exceptionalism or patriarchy in general.    I'm sure they've been kept carefully away from any feminist literature (well, except maybe "Jane Eyre" or "Little Women").  Have they read anything written by a person of color?   Have they really participated in an intense discussion where the outcome is not necessarily in line with their family's beliefs?

The self-serving reference to writing a book as a sign of education screams that the Botkin family doesn't really educate their children.  My project related to TKAM was on the Nazi Olympics of 1936 which was an extravaganza of highly organized propaganda for the Nazis.  The Nazis produced plenty of books and articles on why genocide was not only needed, but beneficial to humankind at large.   IOW, writing a book does not prove that the author is thinking critically at all. 

Let's be honest.  The Botkin Sisters two books are awful on so many levels.....

One thing that I think that I mentioned in the last part was novels and fiction and how young ladies can read too many of those and they can escape through them and they can become enraptured by them and that's not the only reason I would caution girls not to read them. The other reason is that there are so many other books that need to be read right now. Elizabeth and I have a reading list that's about a mile long and I don't know if we're ever going to get through it. Some of the subjects that we're studying right now are theology and worldview, writing and communication, history and understanding the times. There's so much to study. There's so much to learn. And I do believe that reading books is the best way to do that.

Mmm-k. 

"Worldview" and "Understanding the Times" are not exactly tricky academic subjects - and I really doubt either of the Botkin Sisters are digging deeply into authors who have any opinions that diverge from the party line. 

Theology, writing, communication and history are genuine areas of study - but it's rare that someone would be able to combine all four of those topics and study them deeply enough to be a real expert.  Perhaps if they were studying a specific theological doctrine and how it changed over time....that would lead to a paper of some sort....and I guess that the presentations on the final topic would be a form of communication...but I'm never going to see that from the Botkin Sisters. 

I feel sad reviewing this section because I know how much the Botkin Sisters have missed.  Imagine if they had attended a college or a seminary.  Imagine if they joined Toastmasters.  Imagine if they took a few community college classes on public speaking.  Imagine if they acted in a community theater or started a book club that read works by women, LGBT+ or people of color.  Imagine if they flipped burgers at the local greasy spoon or joined a literacy outreach to their local community. 

Imagine if they lived fully.

11 comments:

  1. Will they even be eligible for social security once they get old enough?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To the best of my knowledge, no - and that is now the MOST DEPRESSING thing I've written on this blog :-(

      In the US, we have to "earn" 40 credits towards Social Security by paying FICA taxes to be fully eligible. The bar on earning these credits is purposefully set very, very low. This year, each $1,320 dollars in income earns one SS credit with a maximum of 4 credits earned per year. Personally, this means I've earned all four credits for SS every year between when I was 17-34 for a total of 68 credits.

      They need to have a job that pays FICA taxes and makes at least $5280 a year for 10 years to qualify for SS. That's not hard to do since that's completely do-able at a job flipping burgers for a fast-food joint. But they do need to get that job.

      Most women who stay-at-home with a family have a bit of a safety net in that spouses also qualify for the SS income that they have earned OR the amount their spouse has earned. But the sisters aren't married - and they are over 18 so their have no claim on their parent's SS benefits.

      Delete
  2. If you have to try so hard to convince yourself and your audience there's nothing to be ashamed of, I'm guessing that deep down in your soul you know there is something wrong and you just don't want to "go there".
    That's how shame's been in my life. If I'm out of place somewhere ... let's say I'm a head taller than everyone else in my grade in 6th grade... then I feel awkward. Maybe embarrassed. But I don't feel *shame*.
    Shame is reserved for that feeling I had when I knew my family was dysfunctional and didn't know how to articulate it or want anyone else to find out. Once I grew up and learned more about family dynamics, I could understand where that shame was coming from.
    So I'd like to suggest that if these ladies struggle with shame, and they believe that's a pervasive problem among homeschool girls to a simple question like "what do you do", then maybe, possibly.... deep down their soul knows there *is* something wrong.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well I feel dopey, I thought you were done with that podcast. More reading material here just means more fun for me :) I sure am sorry about your husband's injury! Glad he's doing ok.

    "The Botkin girl who is speaking in this section clearly believes her father's method is great - but the story is creepy as hell to me."

    When I hear that account, I always visualize what looks like the timeline of Elizabeth's childhood: girls are kept very sheltered for a long time, taught stringent views, dress in baggy clothes and keep to themselves in peer groups as they described, then Geoffrey finally finds a new employment position for his extremist junk (Vision Forum) and decides the kids, being his ambassadors, need to get to work promoting his vision as well. Time for the girls to advertise their family's lifestyle, so NOW Elizabeth really needs to get over that shyness issue and pronto.

    Seriously, that shyness as sin junk is apparently spread around a good deal in these circles. I have a more or less QF type Facebook friend who, like many, seems more easy-going now than when he was an older teen while VF was in its heyday, and on his blog he even mentioned back around that time that shyness was generally sinful. I found that old entry just recently and pointed out that no, that is not a Biblical idea.

    I've had fluctuating ideas about the Botkin's life. I think they got somewhat happier as they reached their mid-20's than they were as teens, when they were deepest in their fiery VF speak. Their writing took on more variety in tone and their second book was actually light-hearted in parts, so I'm hoping they gradually move further and further away from the extremism and broaden their horizons, esp now that the gas giant of the Vision Forum has burned out. (On the other hand, without a lucrative outlet like the VF to uphold him as a leader, Geoffrey may have clamped down on them even harder. In fact, it just occurred to me, but I can't help wondering if MAYBE one of the girls would be married by now had that big pool of like-minded men not closed down). The girls seemed to get a little happier and more expressive in their own voices to me as they got a little older, which occurred around the same time I saw the shift in their writing. Now? I don't know..they described several activities they've taken part in, like real estate and traveling. But like you said, sources of income have shrank along with their family projects, as brothers have left and started families. It's not the same for them and I'm sure they feel it. I hope they're ok, but I also want them just discontent enough to move forward..and outward. However long that process takes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, there's still at least one post left on this podcast!

      I definitely get the feeling that the Botkins kids are taught whatever skills will benefit Geoffrey directly or indirectly through making a good impression of people Geoffrey wants to impress - rather than doing what is in the best interest of the kid.

      I was rather shy and retiring as a kid and grew out of it in time. Being told that I had to get over it because it was sinful would not have made me less shy. I would have been neurotic, though....

      In terms of their overall writing tone, I've chalked it up to a natural mellowing that comes with age. Teenagers and college-aged people have an amazing energy that often comes out as a crusade against the massed injustices of their lives. The rationales are very black-and-white and nuance/political considerations are considered selling out the vision. Then...real life starts to intrude. The people who railed against corporations find out that working for one is nice and that they can support excellent causes very well between giving money and interesting other well-to-do people in the cause. People get jobs through contacts (instead of the entirely merit-based world they championed). A woman who swore she'd never sacrifice her career to be a caregiver...had a preemie son, dropped her career like a hot potato and regrets nothing. The handful of people who have kept their young refusal to compromise on anything that I know from 10-15 years ago are bouncing around in dead-end jobs and dead-end relationships because they are still searching for that perfect job and perfect person.

      The Botkin Sisters had access to a lot of economic resources in their teens and early 20's due to Vision Forum. They traveled a lot. They've been involved in the acceptable version of cos-play by emulating Protestant heroines for historical fetes. They had adoring fans from their books and lots of chances to speak. It was nice - and you know - I don't begrudge them that. But real life intruded. Lots of VF young women were marrying...and they weren't. At first, I'm sure there were plenty of sensible reasons but that icy feeling of nervousness started sinking in. Their family's finances have always seemed to be precarious to me; Geoffrey Botkin doesn't seem to DO anything other than putz around. The Vision Forum collapse has to have shaken them a bit; most of their perks came from running in the same circle as Doug Phillip who was abusing his family's nanny. The sisters mentioned in "It's Not" that being unmarried in their early and mid-twenties was not what they had planned for their lives. And now they are near and over age 30.

      It's time for them to think about what they want from life. If they want biological children, they each need to get serious about finding a good man to marry because female fertility doesn't last forever. If they are open to adoption or are ok not having kids, the timeline is more open - but they deserve more from life than being an third wheel in their parents' marriage for the rest of their lives.

      Delete
    2. Oh good, another post :)

      I totally agree. They've been taught to believe their whole lives that they were meant for husbands and children, so even aside from natural desires to start new stages in their lives, they won't be content as just cogs in the family system. Especially not now that the main market for their messages has decreased, which also means Geoffrey has no reason to keep them tied to his hip anymore. If the girls' own "daughterly influence" or gumption isn't enough to propel them forward, I sure hope someone else intercedes for them, like a family member or even older friend; no idea what their mother's line of thinking generally is or whether she notices their emotional well-being more than their dad.

      I was very shy as a kid too, coming out of my shell in elementary school only to be scared back inside in middle school. One of my boldest moments in my teens came when I introduced myself to a somewhat shy guy I had a long-burning torch for. Not exactly the Botkin-advised way, as I harbored no sisterly feelings whatsoever, but it works. And hey, it was in Youth Camp.

      Delete
  4. "But instead I think we should look at this question as an opportunity to talk to people about the beauties of God's design."

    Okay, but how? This would be a very good time to provide young women with some actual language to describe what they are doing. Especially since I still don't know exactly what it is.

    "A lot of people have responded very interestingly when Anna and I tell them what we're doing and why. A lot of girls actually.have responded very wistfully and said, "You know what? I wish I could do that."

    Do what? Dear God, what do they say they are doing??? Also, what the Botkins do is different from what most young women staying in their parents homes without pursuing any education or career training do. They can say that they are writers and professional speakers, although I don't know if they would because that would sound too careerist. But most young women aren't do what they're doing. Some women might be able to say "I work in my father's business" which seems respectable enough but, again, not all. Are they advising women to actually just say "I live at home and am training for marriage and motherhood?" If so, say so!

    Also, OMG, I WANT that DS9 Dominion woman fanfic podcast! Except, would it be about the Founders? Because, sine Odo is the only Changeling who really has a gender identity, they don't strictly speaking have "women." (There is that one who interacts with Odo the most but her appearance as a woman seems to be more something she affects to make herself more familiar to him.) I mean, there's Vorta women, I guess, though it's a pretty androgynous society. And the Jem'Hadar were all men!

    Still though, there were plenty of peoples under the Dominion that we knew less about I guess..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As far as I can tell, the stay-at-home daughter movement is all about staying at home to learn those tricky homemaking skills like...um...cooking and doing whatever your dad wants you to do until he marries you off. I've assumed that the details are purposefully kept vague because trying to fill them in shows how questionable the logic is in the first place. Perhaps doubly so in home schooled families that spend way less than 6-8 hours a day doing school work; with all that extra time, shouldn't the daughters be very competent in basic homemaking skills along with home repair and basic auto repair by the end of their teenage years? I managed to learn how to do all those things along with crochet and sewing while attending a traditional school full-time and participating in after-school activities.

      One of my issues with Star Trek in general is the masculine slant of entire civilizations. DS9 (in the earlier seasons I remember) had two female bridge characters; Kira and Dax. Kira was a nice change of pace in that she was an aggressive woman. (My twin sister recognized even back then that Kira's character makes a lot more sense as a closeted lesbian to boot.) Dax is a young woman...who has a theoretically multiple gender parasite in her but we generally only hear from the old man character. The only three characters I can think of who presented with traditionally feminine attire were Keiko O'Brien, Kai Opaka, and Vedek Winn. Opaka gets killed off/banished pretty quickly. Keiko O'Brien generally comes across as vaguely irritated about her life - but won't fight back aggressively or capitulate when threatened; she just becomes sad. (And let's be honest; she had two clear choices when Winn objected to her teachings on the wormhole. If all the Bajoran kids pulled out, then Keiko could have stuck to her guns and kept teaching with only the Federation kids -- but does that really make sense? Why should the Federation's view of science as supreme way of knowing trump the Bajoran view of religion as supreme way of knowing? From a space of dealing with an inter-cultural conflict, Winn's suggestion of just leaving the wormhole out of the curriculum for now makes a lot of sense - although it would destroy the entire rest of the story arc. Since the Federation chose not to intervene in a 50-year occupation of Bajor by Cardassians, it's not like the Federation has a moral high ground here.) And there is something seriously wrong with Winn; she's either a psychopath that no one seems to have noticed before or she's far too good at deciding that people who get in her way should be killed. The writers missed a chance for a seriously fascinating backstory on her; she was old enough to remember Bajor before the Occupation. What does it do to a person to see their whole culture destroyed as a teenager? Why did she choose to become a religious figure instead of a member of the Resistance? What is it like to have to try and keep a society going - babies needed to be raised, children educated, adults given employment and elderly people cared for - when Cardassians could and did kill people indiscriminately? What's it like to spend your life working for that - and then have to work with a prickly, under-educated former resistance member half your age who was given a job that she has no qualifications for and is dating one of your coworkers?

      Delete
  5. This strikes me as a bit funny, but I can't really imagine that the Botkin women spend a whole lot of time reading up on current events, despite making a big show of "understanding the times". I would define "understanding the times" as some combination of understanding politics/policy.

    I think the Botkins define it as "wringing their hands about the degraded state of femininity today".

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with your assessment unfortunately!

      Delete