Monday, April 16, 2018

Maidens of Virtue: Chapter 17

Well, the chapter "Daddy's Fair Maiden" in Stacy McDonald's mother-daughter book "Maidens of Virtue" does an excellent job of portraying how creepy the idea of a father keeping his daughter's heart safe prior to marriage sounds to the rest of humanity.  Along the way, Mrs. McDonald takes swipes at non-CP/QF teenagers, offering age-appropriate Sunday Schools at churches, and the entire idea of Youth Group at churches.  Really, all this has done is make me extremely worried about any churches that hired her husband James McDonald as a pastor. 

We may as well jump in at the beginning:

Emily waited for her parents by the water fountain, the designated meeting place after Sunday school class was over. She watched the young people file out of the classroom. Many, she knew, did not claim Christ, although they came to church and Sunday school each week - a prerequisite for attending Friday night youth group. Youth Group - this was one of the seemingly many activities she wasn't allowed to join. Emily tried to shrug off growing sense of resentment. Why did her family always have to be so different?

Emily's parents had asked her if she would join them in their adult Sunday school class, so they could all learn together. She already attended the worship service with her parents, instead of sitting with the " youth kids." Emily had begged to remain in the teen Sunday school class at least until the end of the year, and her father reluctantly agreed. All the other kids at church were in age segregated classrooms -she didn't want to be different again. (pg. 155)

An important technique for creating a realistic fictional character is to map out their backstory.  An author would be well served by answering some questions about Emily like how many siblings she has, where does she fit in the family birth order and how old Emily is before launching into writing the story.   I bring this up because I have no idea why Emily is waiting for her family at a water fountain if she's old enough to be in a youth group and around people who are old enough to date.  If she has a ton of younger siblings who can't be trusted to head out to the car, that makes sense.  If not, is Emily too immature to make it to the car?

Let me get this straight: Emily's family attends an age-segregated church where they allow her to attend the teenage section under protest but won't let her go to the youth group or sit with the other teenagers at the service.  Those kind of parents tend to bring up three possible concerns for me.  First concern: the teenager is in a domestic abuse situation with one or both parents and is being isolated to prevent intervention.  Second concern: massively over controlling parents who are trying to keep their teens dependent on them.  Third concern: the teenager has such severe behavioral issues that they cannot be left alone without potentially bad outcomes. 

Has Emily's family asked anyone about if Emily (and any younger siblings) are welcome into the adult study group - or are they simply going to spring this on the facilitator/pastor? 

The parish I grew up in was relatively low on age groupings simply because it was a small parish focused on reaching Catholics who felt marginalized in "normal" parishes.  We had a much higher than average population of single parents, divorced parents, members with developmental or intellectual disabilities, and an entire group of Deaf Catholics.   In that setting, most of the classes held in the day or evenings were open to anyone who wanted to attend - usually.  The major exception was that some classes were covering topics that might be disturbing to kids, involved a long-term committment to a project, or involved people sharing life experiences like abuse or drug addiction.  Parents were assumed to steer their kids away from classes like that. 

I'd hate to be the presenter covering sexuality in marriage on the day that Emily's clueless parents trot their extremely sheltered daughter in to class....

Mrs. McDonald spends a few paragraphs making sure everyone knows that the other teenagers at Sunday School are unsaved heathens who are not worth the time to characterize.  Eventually, she drifts back to her main character:

Although Emily had many good friends, at the moment it seemed as though she didn't have a friend in the world. Confused by her intense desire to fit in, she temporarily lost sight of the wonderful family she had. For a moment she even seem to forget God. (pg. 156)

That paragraph was written to immunize the mothers reading this book against taking their daughters' heartfelt loneliness too seriously.  See, Emily isn't really lonely; she's got good friends who are so great that they don't even get names*!  Emily can't be lonely if she has a family!  Families fulfill every need a human has!  Loneliness is a sign of idolatry because if Emily is lonely she's putting humans before God!

*I described this quote to my husband.  He blinked, paused for a moment and said, "They name their girl children?  Shouldn't their names be given by their husbands?"  He paused for a moment and said, "Saying that makes me feel gross." 

Yes, my love, reading these books makes me feel gross, too.  That's why I write the blog.

She knew Brittney's dress and behavior did not honor God, yet Emily found herself drawn to her magnetic personality and even a little jealous of her sophisticated appearance.

Emily look down at the simple, pretty dress she was wearing. Her mother had made it for her last summer, and Emily had relished the time spent alone with her helping to sew on the lace trim and silk buttons. She had thought at the most beautiful dress she had ever seen and had twirled around as fast as she could to make the skirt form a circle in the air. Somehow, she now felt strange and conspicuous in her beautiful dress - maybe even a bit silly. (pg. 156)

*gasps and clutches pearls*

If Emily's behavior doesn't honor God....does that mean that works matter?  What kind of hard-core Calvinist are you! Brittney might be a member of the Elect -and won't Mrs. McDonald feel bad when she find that out later.

The second paragraph is a sweet reflection on the joys of sewing that leaves me wondering just how many siblings Brittney has.  If Brittney's an only child or youngest child at home, cherishing time alone with her mom doesn't make much sense.  If she's an oldest daughter in a massive family, it makes more sense (along with the water fountain meeting point) but makes me worried about how many kids are going to be dragged to the adult Sunday school class. 

On the sewing point: what kind of dress was Brittney wearing?  Lace trim goes into and out of fashion pretty regularly so that seemed reasonable on a teenager's church dress.  Silk buttons, though, were jarring.  I've only ever worn silk buttons on prom and wedding attire.  Maybe Mrs. McDonald meant fabric covered buttons which would have been dowdy on a teenager in the 1980's - but I think it would have been possible.  Or perhaps Mrs. McDonald knew exactly what she meant and Emily wearing a potential wedding dress to church every week to signal that she's of marriageable age....

Brittney sashayed passed Emily with an entourage of admiring boys. Emily wondered what it would be like to have boys look at her the way they looked at Brittney. She blushed as she imagined dressing in Brittney's clothes and enjoying the same attention. Emily knew Britney dated; she imagined what it to go out with a boy. Her mind continue to wonder...

Her thoughts suddenly switch to her father and how disappointed he would be with her recent thoughts. She found herself feeling ashamed and confused. (pg. 156-157)

CP/QF authors often describe teenage vignettes that I've never seen before.  I've never seen a teenage girl with such raw sexual appeal that scads of young men follow her around like ducklings to the exclusion of all other girls.   Teenagers are descended from people who managed to mate successfully.  Finding a potential mate or romantic interest is as much a numbers game as anything else.  Unless Brittney has a group of wing-women with her, guys who she's not that into will break off and find other girls.  Heck, if Emily wants the guys to notice her in her wedding dress Sunday dress, she could try talking calmly and attentively to Brittney..

Ew....

Emily feels ashamed because she thinks her father would be disappointed that she has sexual feelings.   That's a seriously messed up way to raise a kid. 

She's more than old enough to have sexual feelings and thoughts.  Emily's not done anything wrong under the vast majority of moral codes.  She's not leering or behaving in behaviors that make others uncomfortable.  She's not engaging in premarital flirtation let alone premarital sex. 

Teaching Emily to associate sexual feelings or thoughts with shame is setting her up for a hard transition to married sexuality....

Emily had felt secure and protected the day her father had taken her hands in his and promised to protect her until the day he placed her hand in that of her husband. She had agreed not to give her heart away, but instead to remain emotionally and physically pure before marriage, and trust her parents guidance through courtship instead of dating (Isaiah 62:5)

"Where's my fair maiden?" asked a strong, loving voice behind her. Emily snapped out of her reverie of discontent and faced her protector ashamed. He stood beside her mother, his admiring eyes and cheerful words reminding her of who she truly wanted to be - her father's fair maiden. (pg. 157)

Did Emily truly have the option of saying no to her father's offer of "protection" in return for accepting a courtship model of dating?  If a person can't say no, they cannot really say yes either. 

That quote from Isaiah 62 has nothing to do with courtship, emotional purity or dating.  It's describing that God rejoices in Israel in the same way that a groom rejoices in his bride. 

There is a clear, bright line between the familial affection between parents and children and the inappropriate incestuous abuse.  This story is on the moral side of the line - but, damn, it's close to that line.   My dad and mom were often proud of me and happy about how mature and grown-up I was becoming.  The word "admiring" is a bit more ambiguous since it can imply an ownership of the other person or can be used to describe appreciating someone's sexual attractiveness.  With the public testimony of the Willis family's oldest daughter that she was sexually abused by her father starting in early childhood through when she left her home, I'm very sensitive right now to readers of this book who might be in a similar situation.

Then another thought hit her. What if she were to dress and act like Brittney? Not only would she not be able to bear the disapproving gaze of her father, but what would her future husband think of her? Would he turn and run? Would he want to marry someone who behaves like a loose, silly girl? Or would he be waiting for a true maiden of honor-has her father had done? Emily glance tenderly at her mother.

In stark contrast, she turned to see Brittney hanging on a boy's arm, laughing indiscreetly. She contemplated further: if he were interested in someone like Brittney, would Emily really want to marry him- a man with no depth, no standards or wisdom, lit only by his visual, temporal pleasures? No way! (pg. 157)

Hi, Emily's mom!  I'm glad you've received a token acknowledgement of existence.  This whole story makes me wonder if post-menopausal women continue to exist in CP/QF life - or do they disappear after they can no longer reproduce?  Equally importantly, women have traditionally been in charge of teaching their daughters the sexual mores of a community.  Women also take on the majority of monitoring their daughters' adherence to the mores.  Handing that job off the to men - even the girl's father - feels inappropriate.

Notice that Mrs. McDonald is slut-shaming Brittney for being more popular with the boys than Emily.  Brittney's not done anything inappropriate so far.  She's touched a guy's arm while flirting and laughed loudly.   That's normal operating procedure for Midwestern/Great Lakes teens.  In terms of wisdom, Brittney's not spent the last few minutes obsessing over what her father thinks of her budding sexuality so I'm giving the wisdom badge to Brittney.

So...Emily wants to marry someone as judgmental towards others as she is and expects him to be as confused and conflicted about sexuality as she is.  Cool.  That sounds like a match made in heaven.  *shudders*

The story wraps up with Emily giving her dad a hug followed by a completely far-fetched change of heart by Brittney:

Emily didn't notice, but Brittney had caught sight of the precious father -daughter embrace, and a curious pang of longing struck her heart. What was it like to be loved and protected the way this young girl was loved and protected? How much does it feel to be so confident of God's love that you didn't have to beg for the wrong kind of attention by stooping to flirtatious stunts? Emily was one of the only girls at church who appear different to Brittney.

[...]

Brittney had met many Christians at this church, but she hadn't met anyone who seemed to be so much different than anyone else you knew. Maybe Emily and her family were really different - maybe they had some answers. She decided to ask. (pg. 158)


Yes!  Go have dinner with Emily's family.  That will end well.   Emily is smouldering with barely repressed jealousy towards Brittney who she's pre-judged to be a whore.  Emily is transferring all of her budding sexual energy into her relationship with her dad.  I'm sure Emily's mother is totally ok with all this energy between her husband and daughter. 

In real life, teenagers will pick a budding romantic relationship with a peer over a healthy hug between a random father and daughter.  Thank God for that - it will keep Brittney away from this crazy family.

26 comments:

  1. Yeah... That last Brittney bit was so off base it can hardly be anything but an attempt to reassure the Emilies: Don´t worry, they´re as jealous of them as you are of them and in the end they will come crawling, begging for your superior insights, making YOU the center of things.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The ending of these stories are really terrible. Mrs. McDonald is so cued on on writing a fantasy about what she wishes would happen in daily life that it loses all sense of reality.

      Delete
  2. Every time I see pictures or read about this father-daughter vows thing it makes my stomach turn. This sets up the child these men are supposed to be raising to be functional adults for a world of abuse by similarly minded men. Gross.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm horrified with how rampant child sexual abuse is turning out to be in the subset of emotional purity that likes father-daughter purity vows. Slate showed a photographer's portfolio of 5-8 photos of father/daughter(s) pairs at purity ball. One of those fathers has since been charged with sexual abuse.

      The other thing that is in my mind is Jessica Willis Fisher's description of how her mom suspected something was wrong with the way her husband was treating Jessica - but somehow he always eventually broke boundaries again. Being a quiet, accepting woman in CP/QF families is not in the best interest of the children if the husband is abusive.

      Delete
    2. I am someone who was not raised by a particularly religious family, but I tried to be "the good wife" by basically CP standards when I got married. That was a disaster for me. I am still recovering 11 years later and will likely be on medication for anxiety for the rest of my life. But I was able to get out, and my family supported that.

      These poor girls have nowhere to go and it hurts my heart.

      Delete
    3. Mine too, Helpdesk Chick.

      I think what scares me equally is the number of girls who don't realize the amount of damage this lifestyle does to them. The girls who blame themselves for not being able to fully crush their personality and desires to conform rather than blaming insane theology.

      Delete
  3. Something I've always wondered about - if they're all pro keeping the kids with the adults for bible study, when do the adults get to learn something beyond "beginner level"?

    I mean, I'd like to think adults who have done years of bible study have learned something from it, and that they don't need to get the same introduction to biblical themes that a 12-16 year old does. I studied Hamlet in grade 7, and it was appropriate and interesting to me, but that doesn't mean a grad student in literature would have got anything out of the class.

    How do you talk meaningfully about most of the bible without hitting on topics they try to hide from their children? I can't see how a discussion of the sexual imagery/metaphor/content in the story of Samson and Delilah is enhanced by the contribution of a 6 year old, or a very sheltered young teen? Do Emily's parents want all the other adults to censor their discussions to only what they want Emily and her younger siblings to hear?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is another extremely valid concern that gets glossed over far too frequently.

      Many CP/QF churches are solidly against any form of academic study of the Bible on the grounds that anyone can understand the Bible simply by reading it. I find that point of view both terrifying and baffling. The Bible contains massively different genres of literature that span thousands of years of history; it's hardly light reading material! Even for people who are ignorant of the last 100 years of Biblical studies, simply flipping through the Bible makes it pretty clear that Deuteronomy =/= Psalms =/= John =/= Titus.

      And honestly, I'm not sure how many of the authors of the books I've reviewed here read the Bible for comprehension. Stacy McDonald's Bible quotes are generally completely off-the-mark...but so are the Botkin Sisters and Steven Maxwell's. It's like they are sharing an indexed list of Bible verses by topic and simply pull quotes from the list without reading the actual verse. (I proof-read a few friends religion papers in HS who did just that; the result is pretty close to citing Isaiah 62 as being in favor of courtship because the verse talks about marriage...kind of.)

      Delete
    2. And yet, they ALWAYS seem to be doing "Bible study?" What on earth are they doing with it? How many hours can you actually log doing shallow, unalytical, sola scriptura Bible-reading before it just gets boring and repetitive. I mean, unless you're going to bring in commentaries and scholarly sources and actual close readings, there just stops being much to say fairly quickly. The Christian Bible is a long book but it's not THAT long. I seriously wonder what all of these hours of "study" over a lifetime can possibly consist of.

      Delete
    3. Since a high proportion of CP/QF folk are also deeply in favor of the KJV of the Bible, I assumed most of their time was used trying to decode/translate what the verse means in modern English. I'm a strong reader - but I can barely figure out what modern English verse a random KJV verse comes from.

      Then deciding how to wrap as much bashing of other people into a verse takes a while too. Deciding which modern issue to attach a random verse from Judges or Deuteronomy that gives a one-sided description of a minor battle...it's hard! :-)

      Delete
    4. As a person who grew up going to the adults' classes instead of getting to be with kids my own age, I can tell you "boring and repetitive" is more a feature not a bug in those bible studies. Of course if you ever were to admit you were bored it would be your fault, not the person leading (or the bible).

      Delete
    5. Boring and repetitive describes most of the Sunday school and bible studies I've been in. They spend a lot of time going over the verses in the passage of the day one phrase at a time. But of course not using any outside material kind of reduces it down to "What does this verse say to you?" over and over. It's like the most shallow poetry class ever.

      Delete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  5. "I'd hate to be the presenter covering sexuality in marriage on the day that Emily's clueless parents trot their extremely sheltered daughter in to class..."

    I love how you make me smile and sum up the issues present at the same time. With this story, there's sooo much to pore over. Apparently my response must be in two parts, so here goes:

    "Confused by her intense desire to fit in, she temporarily lost sight of the wonderful family she had. For a moment she even seem to forget God."

    That pisses me off to no end, for just the reasons you mentioned. Kids NEED PEER FRIENDS. If you look at most of the mainstream unmarried (and married, for that matter) female QF speakers, they all actually have friends their own age. This includes bloggers I've seen as well as Mcdonald's own daughters and the Botkin daughters (and sons). The Botkins made a brief point in their second book that all your friends don't have to be your age, and they were right, but since QF daughters and sons (most of them) have plenty of peer friends just like other kids, I have no clue why any amount of pressure would be put on the poor things through faulty writing to do otherwise.

    "Emily feels ashamed because she thinks her father would be disappointed that she has sexual feelings."

    And she's not just having sexual feelings; she wants to be seen as attractive. This is something little girls want too. Imagine a six-year-old Emily feeling guilty and afraid her dad would be mad at her for wanting to be like Jasmine or Belle, admired and sought by a boy.

    And the idea that she forgot God, because she felt LONELY without friends her age..there's something so insidious and harmful in that terrible message.

    "Emily had felt secure and protected the day her father had taken her hands in his and promised to protect her until the day he placed her hand in that of her husband. She had agreed not to give her heart away, but instead to remain emotionally and physically pure"

    Something weird happens to me when I read that paragraph: my hands suddenly want to flip or throw something right in the air while screaming. "Are you KIDDING! That is NOT Biblical, that is maudlin and obnoxious and creepy! That father's a mushy DUMB-head!" is basically the gist of what I'm inwardly screaming, while picturing hitting the family over the heads with a Bible. Maybe I shouldn't read that paragraph anymore.

    Next point...Ok, Emily's ideas of what a future husband would think of her "bad" thoughts have me reaching for the heaviest hardback Bible we own again, right when I think I've calmed down. The snobby, uptight, judgmental pricks that these QF women paint ideal men to be are, to borrow an older word as these people love to do, INTOLERABLE. They are the most piggish prigs I've ever seen recommended in any self-help/spiritual book and I can't believe these authors don't see how disgusting their descriptions of manhood, on top of their horrific, fathoms deep guilting of women really are. 

    ReplyDelete
  6. The ending wraps up the whole grossly pretentious mush of the fam and their morals with that toddlerish embrace. Normal teenagers don't do anything other than hide, cowering, under the nearest shrub when their fathers start to sound like they're waxing Victorian terms of endearment in public.

    The thing is, it COULD have been a nicer story about a girl feeling ok with being different and secure in familial love. It seems nice that E's parents thought her mature enough to join their Bible study, but judging from their other nauseating ideas, it mostly screams isolation from peers to me. That, too, could be understandable if the parents have genuine concerns about bad behavior from the church's teens. But if all the teens are like that, and the fam hates the age segregation anyway, I can only wonder what the heck they're doing at that church to begin with.

    Which leads me to my last point: it could be realistic that Brittney wants a closer relationship with her dad and envies E's closeness with hers. The additional lines, though, about how E is SO much different from just anyone else at that church, is typical stuffy QF wishful thinking about how the rest of the world secretly envies them. So is Brittney's sudden transition from enjoying male teen attention to thinking in word-for-word Mcdonald speak.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your refreshing input, Jenny!

      Delete
    2. Welcome :) I didn't know it'd be that long. And thank you!

      Delete
  7. I think that the group of admiring boys could just be a misinterpretation of a group of mixed sex friends. All my life I was one of a group that was usually at least 50-50 boys, sometimes more boys than girls. In my bowling leagues (youth and now adult), I'm often the only female on the lanes. My most immediate coworkers are all men. I think that if someone is emotionally immature, they'd look at me and think that I was some kind of harlot for having so many guy friends; reality couldn't be further from the truth!

    By the way, I'm a child development class and our textbook described a real(?) scene right out of mean girls: wearing purple on Tuesdays, jeans only on Fridays, and shunning people who don't comply. I feel like the teen ( "popular high school senior" ) MUST have been trolling the interviewer! Or does this actually happen in real life?!?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't rule it out because it doesn't sound impossible - but my education textbooks often had situations that seemed insane to start with.

      In my Ed. Psych book, there was a section on hazards that included a senior in a Biology class who attempted to eat a formalin preserved frog on a dare. That's a bit unusual (to say the least) but the follow up questions made it clear that the author clearly thought the main issue was that the teacher didn't treat the high school students like toddlers.

      Because of that, I created an amazing spiel - that I used occasionally in real teaching situations - that implied that the reason the kid ate the frog was skipping breakfast. The talk ended with me pleading - pleading! - with students not to scarf down a preserved frog no matter how hungry they were. The students thought it was hilarious and it segued naturally into a serious talk about why pranks in a lab are a horrible idea.

      Delete
    2. "In my Ed. Psych book, there was a section on hazards that included a senior in a Biology class who attempted to eat a formalin preserved frog on a dare."

      BAha. You know what this means? School books, both public and home, have crazy children-are-stupid scenarios.

      Delete
  8. "She watched the young people file out of the classroom. Many, she knew, did not claim Christ, although they came to church and Sunday school each week - a prerequisite for attending Friday night youth group."

    Ah yes, the fundie trope of "People who go to church every week, yet aren't really Christian." Honey, if they're dedicating that much time to church, it's because they "claim Christ." Really. There are far easier ways to hang out with peers than to jump through all those hoops just so you can go to Youth Group. (One of them is called "school.") I mean, they are kids so they could always be being forced by their parents. I certainly had friends as a teen who had to be dragged to church by their parents and some who were having doubts about the beliefs they'd been raised with too. But generally speaking, kids you find at a Christian church are Christian kids. But where's the drama in that! If you live a life so insulated that you never come into contact with actual non-believers, I guess you need to make up armies of them who nevertheless get up early on Sundays to go to church every week, just so you can have some people to judge so life doesn't get too boring.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's a great point. I always chalked it up to the constant need in CP/QF to judge everyone else around them as inferior. (Which is a rough way to live life, honestly.)

      Delete
  9. Too many "you've got to be KIDDING me" moments here to even address them all. I will just say, my first thought was that it seemed odd that the parents would take their family to a church that they thought wasn't teaching the youth a good message. Why would the church be good enough for the adults but not good enough for the kids? It's the same church!
    Seems like maybe they should have found another church because it sure as hell seems to me that the parents just want those kids to be as isolated and controlled as possible.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was a bit thrown by the idea of joining a church when the father seemed hell-bent on refusing to do anything in the methods preferred by the current leadership and membership.

      Unfortunately, I don't think that idea is unusual among CP/QF believers who are also against home-churching. If you can't find a church where your beliefs fit, convert the church.

      Delete
  10. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete